12 minutes
Autonomy, dignity of risk, privacy and informed choice Support a person's right to make choices others would not make, give them what they need to make the choice informed, and protect what they tell you.
What you’ll be able to do Recognize autonomy, dignity of risk, privacy and informed choice in a situation where staff feel pressure to decide for someone, and choose the response that supports the person's decision. Compare the responses to this question and explain your choice: What is the response that respects autonomy and dignity of risk? Document a next step for Autonomy, dignity of risk, privacy and informed choice: Think of a decision you have seen staff make for a participant “for their own good.” Write down what information, in what format, would have let the person make it themselves, and who could have provided it. The right to a life with risk in it Every adult makes choices others think are unwise: a job with an uncertain future, a move far from family, a diet, a relationship. We call this autonomy and we do not ask people to earn it. People with disabilities are routinely asked to earn it, to prove they can manage a risk before they are allowed to take it, by staff who would never accept the same test themselves. Dignity of risk is the name for the alternative: the recognition that overprotection is its own harm, and that the chance to try, fail and try again is part of a full life.
Dignity of risk does not mean indifference. It means the team's energy goes into making a chosen risk manageable rather than into preventing the choice. It also means the person must understand the risk, which is where informed choice comes in. A choice is informed when the person received the relevant information in a form they could use, had time to consider it, could ask questions and knew they could say no. A signature on a form the person could not read is consent in name only.
Privacy sits alongside these. Much of what people tell us in this work is intimate: health, money, relationships, fears. It is protected by law, and it is protected by professional habit: not discussing a participant where others can hear, not sharing more than the next person needs, not recording more than the program requires. When someone entrusts you with private information to get support, protecting it is part of the support.
Four principles, tested in practice Autonomy Test: Would an adult without a disability have to ask permission for this? If not, the participant should not either. Your role is support, not approval.
Dignity of risk Test: Is the team working to make the chosen path safer, or to close it? Reminders, backup plans and check-ins the person agrees to are support. “Prove it first” is a barrier.
Informed choice Test: Could the person explain the options and the main risks back to you in their own words? If not, the information has not been delivered yet, however many pages were handed over.
Privacy Test: Does the person know what you recorded, who can see it and why? Would you be comfortable if they heard how their situation was discussed in the hallway?
Plan for the risk, not against the choice What you can change You control whether a safety concern becomes a condition the person must satisfy or a problem the team solves with them.
What to watch for Do not turn “we are worried about X” into “not until X is fixed.” Do not withhold a real risk from the person to avoid a hard conversation.
Your next step In your next planning conversation where staff are worried, ask the group: “What would make this manageable?” before anyone says “not yet.”
Overprotection is not the safe choice. It is a choice with its own harm, made by someone other than the person who lives with it.
Practices that protect choice and privacy Explain risk in usable form
One risk at a time, in plain words, with what could happen and what could reduce it. Ask the person to say it back. Offer it in writing or pictures to keep.
Say no is an option
Consent that cannot be refused is not consent. Tell people plainly that they can decline, change their mind or ask for more time, and mean it.
Record the decision as theirs
“She chose to move to her own apartment. The team discussed medication management with her and she chose the following supports.” Not: “Team agreed to allow move.”
Need-to-know
Share only what the next person needs to provide their part of the support. A transportation provider needs the pickup time, not the diagnosis.
Where you talk
Not in the lobby, not in the hallway, not with the door open. Privacy is physical before it is procedural.
Where to take a question
Questions about what the law requires you to record, share or protect go to the program's data practices or privacy staff. Do not guess in either direction.
Carry this forward Dignity of risk is the idea that a life with no chance of failure is not a full life. Adults without disabilities take risks every day; disabled people have the same right.
A choice is informed only when the person had the information in a form they could use, the time to consider it and the freedom to say no.
Privacy is part of dignity. What a person shares with you about their body, mind or life is theirs; where it goes is your responsibility.
A scenario decision about a choice staff disagree with, a knowledge check and a written reflection on a risk you would take that you might not allow someone else.
Think of a decision you have seen staff make for a participant “for their own good.” Write down what information, in what format, would have let the person make it themselves, and who could have provided it.
Browse and download only. Course notes are not typed or saved on this page.
Reset this lesson
Previous lesson Back to course Participation and course completion in this program do not count toward DHS-required training credits unless management, a director, or DHS leadership expressly approves an exception.
