8 minutes
Who is missed — and who is not asked Empty chairs are data. Map whose identity we skip, and whose privacy we treat as public.
What you’ll be able to do Identify the practical implication of “Who is missed — and who is not asked” and apply it to one live DHS decision connected to LGBTQ+ Inclusion in Disability Services. Compare the responses to this question and explain your choice: What should happen before the work is locked? Document a next step for Who is missed — and who is not asked: Choose one live work object, name a change or formal escalation, assign an owner, and set the date the result will be reviewed. Ask who never gets asked: people with high support needs, people who do not use speech, people of color, people in greater Minnesota.
What the work actually shows Being asked and being believed are not evenly distributed. People with intellectual disabilities, people who use devices, people of color, Two-Spirit and Native people, and people in greater Minnesota are more likely to be treated as “not really” LGBTQ and less likely to get a correct name, a private circle, or a relationship that is allowed to exist. If your “open” homes are all people who already look like a metro clinic’s idea of out, your practice has a queue you have not named.
In this lesson you will Map who is not asked and who is over-exposed.
Treat communication access as part of identity, not a later translation.
See how race, disability, and place stack in the note.
Name the harm of writing a relationship as a behavior.
If only the people who already look “out” get a correct name, you do not have inclusion. You have a sorting hat.
Who is usually missing People who do not use speech the way we do A device left at home is a missed name and a missed “don’t tell my dad.” Meetings without the device are guesses we write as plans.
People whose dating is called behavior A crush, a kiss, a late-night text. We write risk. We do not ask what they want, who may know, and what support would make it safer.
People of color and people who need another language An English-only identity conversation and a family interpreter who is also the veto are access failures dressed as culture.
Tribal citizens and Two-Spirit people Do not paste a clinic label over a word they did not choose. Ask. Consult. Do not treat Two-Spirit as a synonym you get to assign.
The people we call “not ready to know who they are” are often the people we have not asked in a format they can use. What people actually experience High support = no identity
Staff skip the question because it feels complicated. Skipping is a decision. It writes them as straight and cis by default.
Family as interpreter and veto
The person who translates also shuts the identity down. Get a real interpreter. Ask the person separately.
Rural = stay quiet
Greater Minnesota has people, partners, and privacy needs. Distance is not a reason to skip the name or broadcast it to the only grocery in town.
Safety as isolation
No community, no dating, no internet “for their own good.” Protection that removes a life is still a smaller life.
Who is missing? A person with high support needs who has never been asked what name they want.
Choose a category Not asked / defaulted Privacy missed Place / government path A relationship announced to roommates without their say.
Choose a category Not asked / defaulted Privacy missed Place / government path A Tribal member whose word for themselves was overwritten as a clinic label.
Choose a category Not asked / defaulted Privacy missed Place / government path Family used as the only interpreter for an identity conversation.
Choose a category Not asked / defaulted Privacy missed Place / government path A greater-Minnesota adult told to “keep it quiet in this town.”
Choose a category Not asked / defaulted Privacy missed Place / government path Check matches Reset Next: two honest frames — family-veto versus person-names-self — and when a civil-rights path is real.
Put this lesson to work What you can change You control whether who is missed — and who is not asked changes a live DHS process connected to LGBTQ+ Inclusion in Disability Services or remains information on a page.
What to watch for The team completes the learning, keeps the same default, assigns no owner, and never checks who carries the burden.
Your next step Choose one live work object, name a change or formal escalation, assign an owner, and set the date the result will be reviewed.
Carry this forward Empty chairs are data. Map whose identity we skip, and whose privacy we treat as public.
You control whether who is missed — and who is not asked changes a live DHS process connected to LGBTQ+ Inclusion in Disability Services or remains information on a page.
Choose one live work object, name a change or formal escalation, assign an owner, and set the date the result will be reviewed.
Completion is shown by a scenario decision, a knowledge-check response, a completed sort and a saved one-minute commitment.
Choose one live work object, name a change or formal escalation, assign an owner, and set the date the result will be reviewed.
Browse and download only. Course notes are not typed or saved on this page.
Reset this lesson
Previous lesson Next lesson Participation and course completion in this program do not count toward DHS-required training credits unless management, a director, or DHS leadership expressly approves an exception.
