11 minutes
A draft is a set of decisions about other people What kind of document you are actually holding, what it binds, and how one ordinary-looking sentence becomes a month of somebody else's work.
What you’ll be able to do Name what kind of document you are drafting — law, rule, policy, guidance or work instruction — and trace one requirement in it through to what a person outside DHS actually has to do, find, prove or wait for. Compare the responses to this question and explain your choice: What is the most useful first move? Document a next step for A draft is a set of decisions about other people: Take one requirement from a draft on your desk and write, in plain sentences, the sequence a person outside DHS has to complete to satisfy it. Count the steps, the offices involved and the calendar days. What you are holding, and what it binds Public administration produces a stack of documents that all feel like “the policy” to the person on the other end. They are not the same, and the difference decides what you can change and how long it takes. A requirement in statute is fixed until the Legislature moves. A requirement in an administrative rule changes through rulemaking, on the record, with public notice and comment. Division policy interprets those and directs staff, counties and providers. Guidance explains policy. A work instruction is what a unit wrote so the whole arrangement could be operated on a Tuesday.
Two things follow. First, the sentence you are drafting has a home, and you should know which one before you write it. A requirement that belongs in rule does not become legitimate by appearing in a bulletin, and a reader who treats guidance as binding will comply with something nobody adopted. Second, the documents nearest the bottom of that stack — the guidance, the form, the desk procedure — shape more of what people actually experience than anything above them, and they are the fastest to fix.
This is why equity review pays off most at the policy, guidance and work-instruction level. That is where the channel is chosen, the deadline is set, the proof is named and the tone is decided. None of those are settled by statute. All of them decide who finds the program usable.
Five documents, five different things to change Law Rule Policy Guidance Work instruction
Statute passed by the Legislature. It sets the program's authority and its outer limits. Changing it is a legislative matter, not a drafting decision. What you can do is say plainly in your draft which requirement comes from statute, so the next reader does not spend a month negotiating something that is fixed.
An administrative rule adopted through the state's rulemaking process, with public notice and an opportunity to comment. Rules carry the force of law and change slowly and on the record. That is precisely why a requirement that belongs in a rule should not be quietly invented in a guidance document instead.
The division's own written direction to staff and, often, to counties and providers. It interprets law and rule and makes them operable. This is where equity review pays off most: binding in practice, changeable in months rather than sessions, and usually drafted by people who can still be reached.
Manuals, bulletins, question-and-answer documents and letters that explain how to apply a policy. Guidance is not supposed to create a new requirement, although readers experience it as if it does. If your guidance contains a requirement that appears nowhere above it, that is a finding, not a style question.
The desk procedure, checklist, form field or screen script a unit wrote so the rest could be operated. Nobody outside the unit approved it, most of it is invisible to leadership, and it decides more of what people actually experience than any document above it. It is also the fastest thing on this list to fix.
What one requirement can cost a person An appointment, and the wait for one in the part of the state where they live.
Travel: a car, a ride, a bus route that runs at the right hour, or a day of lost work.
A fee: a records request, a clinic visit, a notary, a certified copy, postage.
A second person: a clinician, an employer, a landlord, a county worker, a relative who has to be asked for help.
An interpreter, and the scheduling that makes one available at the same hour as everything else.
A device, an internet connection and an account, all still working at the end of the process.
Time inside a window they did not choose, counted from a date nobody explained.
Change it while it is still a draft What you can change You control the wording of your own sections, the requirements you propose, and whether you find out where a requirement comes from before you restate it.
What to watch for Do not carry a requirement forward simply because it was in the last version. A restated requirement is a re-decided requirement, and the draft is the cheapest place it will ever be to remove.
Your next step For one requirement in your current draft, find out whether it sits in statute, rule, division policy or a work instruction, and write that finding into your review note.
Words worth keeping apart Requirement
Something a person must do or provide. Every requirement assigns work. Ask what it protects against, and whether that protection is worth the work it creates.
Criterion
The standard a decision is measured against. A criterion can be reasonable and still produce uneven results when the evidence it asks for is unevenly available.
Process
The sequence a person moves through. Most exclusion happens in the sequence rather than the criterion — in the order, the channel, the deadline and the handoffs between offices.
Discretion
The room a worker has to decide. Unwritten discretion is not flexibility; it is uneven treatment nobody can see or appeal. Write down what discretion exists and what should guide it.
Exception
A relief valve for the person who knows it exists and can document a reason. Exceptions are useful, and they are not a fix for a requirement that should not apply to most people.
We were told the verification was required. It took four months to get the appointment, and by then the request had closed and we started again from the beginning. Nobody along the way could tell us who had decided we needed it.
Composite family perspective, illustrative Private reflection, kept by you and not collected anywhere: how might my role, my authority and my familiarity with this program shape what looks like a reasonable requirement to me?
Carry this forward Law, rule, policy, guidance and work instruction are not the same thing. They bind different people, change through different processes, and take different amounts of time to fix. Knowing which one you are holding tells you what you can still change this month.
Most of what people experience as the policy is not the rule. It is a sentence in a bulletin, a field on a form, or a work instruction a unit wrote so the rule could be operated.
Every requirement assigns work to somebody: a document to obtain, an appointment to wait for, a fee to pay, a second person to ask for help, a window to meet. Trace that work before deciding a sentence is reasonable.
The draft is the cheapest place a requirement will ever be to remove. Once it is published, removing it costs a correction, a retraining, and some of the trust you will need next time.
A worked trace from draft sentence to the work it creates, a scenario on a documentation requirement, and a knowledge check on what changing a requirement actually takes.
Take one requirement from a draft on your desk and write, in plain sentences, the sequence a person outside DHS has to complete to satisfy it. Count the steps, the offices involved and the calendar days.
Browse and download only. Course notes are not typed or saved on this page.
Reset this lesson
Course overview Next lesson Carry this into practice A draft is a set of decisions about who will find this easy and who will find it hard. Four lessons on reading your own draft for barriers, unclear requirements, uneven effects and buried assumptions.
Return to the experience: What did you notice or try, whose perspective informed it, and what would you keep or adjust?
Participation and course completion in this program do not count toward DHS-required training credits unless management, a director, or DHS leadership expressly approves an exception.
