9 minutes
Finding your own Denial, honestly A non-punitive look at where cultural difference has not yet become real or relevant in your own daily work, without treating the finding as a verdict.
What you’ll be able to do Identify at least one place in your own daily work where a cultural difference has likely gone unnoticed, without treating the finding as a character verdict. Compare the responses to this question and explain your choice: What is the more honest next step? Document a next step for Finding your own Denial, honestly: Write down one specific area of your own work where you suspect a difference has not yet become real to you, and name one way you could find out whether you are right. The honest version of this question It is easy to answer "where are you in Denial" with a reassuring generality: "I treat everyone the same," "I don't really see color," "people are people to me." Those answers feel safe because they are unfalsifiable — there is nothing specific enough in them to actually check. They are also, often, the clearest sign that Denial is still operating in exactly the place the question was asking about.
A more honest version of the question is narrower and less comfortable: not "am I a person who notices culture," but "which specific group, community, or situation do I interact with rarely enough that I genuinely would not know if my usual approach worked for them?" That question has an answer for almost everyone, including people who have done a great deal of intercultural work in other areas. Naming it plainly is not a confession of failure. It is the actual first step the rest of this program is built on.
What an honest self-check for Denial actually looks like A specific group, community, or situation, not a general claim about your character.
An honest account of how much real, direct contact you have had with that group, not how much you have read or heard about them.
A guess at what you might be missing, stated as a guess rather than a certainty.
One concrete, low-cost way to actually find out whether your guess is right.
I said I treated every family the same, and I believed it. It took a colleague asking me, specifically, when I had last had a real conversation with a family who used an interpreter, for me to notice I couldn't answer.
Composite staff perspective, illustrative Reframes that help this land honestly "I don't know yet" is a legitimate answer
Naming a genuine gap in your own contact or knowledge is more useful, and more honest, than filling it with a comfortable generalization.
This is not a ranking exercise
The point of finding your own Denial is not to score yourself against a colleague. Everyone doing this reflection honestly will find something.
Specificity is the test of honesty
If your answer could apply to literally anyone, it probably has not found anything real yet. Push for a name, a group, a situation.
Carry this forward Everyone has real areas of Denial — places where a difference genuinely has not registered — regardless of how much other intercultural work they have done.
The honest question is not "am I in Denial" as a fixed identity, but "where, specifically, has difference not yet become real to me?"
Finding your own Denial is evidence the reflection is working, not evidence that something is wrong with you.
A specific, honest answer is more useful than a general, reassuring one like "I try to treat everyone the same."
A first-person reflection scenario and a knowledge check on what an honest self-assessment of Denial actually looks like.
Write down one specific area of your own work where you suspect a difference has not yet become real to you, and name one way you could find out whether you are right.
Browse and download only. Course notes are not typed or saved on this page.
Reset this lesson
Previous lesson Next lesson Participation and course completion in this program do not count toward DHS-required training credits unless management, a director, or DHS leadership expressly approves an exception.
