12 minutes
Poverty by design See how asset limits and income cliffs, written to target help, end up penalizing saving and earning.
What you’ll be able to do Explain how asset limits and income cliffs affect the decisions of a person receiving disability benefits, and distinguish the actual rules from the assumptions staff and families make about them. Compare the responses to this question and explain your choice: What is the most useful response? Document a next step for Poverty by design: Ask one person you support what they believe they cannot do with money, and find out from a planner whether it is true. Rules written to target, and what they do instead Asset limits exist so that public benefits go to people with few resources. Income rules exist so that benefits phase out as a person earns. Both are reasonable in intent. In practice, a limit set low enough that a person cannot hold a month's rent in savings does not target help; it makes saving irrational. A person who saves toward a car, a deposit or an emergency finds the savings counted against them, and the sensible response is to spend the money before it is counted. That is not fecklessness. It is what the rule teaches.
Income cliffs do the same to earning. Where a small increase in wages triggers a large loss of coverage or cash, the hours just before the cliff cost more than they pay. People learn where the cliff is and stop short of it, and the record shows a person who chose not to work more.
A rule, or an assumption about a rule? Some programs count savings above a set limit against eligibility.
Choose a category Rule Assumption A person on disability benefits can never have more than a few hundred dollars.
Choose a category Rule Assumption Earnings above certain thresholds affect cash benefits, with the effect depending on the program.
Choose a category Rule Assumption Any job means losing health coverage.
Choose a category Rule Assumption Certain accounts and trusts hold money that is not counted toward asset limits.
Choose a category Rule Assumption Getting married always ends a person's benefits.
Choose a category Rule Assumption Check matches Reset Separate the rule from the story What you can change You control whether a stated belief about money rules is accepted or checked. Most such beliefs arrived years ago from someone who was partly right.
What to watch for Do not confirm a fear you have not verified. A fear confirmed by a staff member becomes a fact the family will act on for years.
Your next step For the next money belief you hear stated as fact, write it down and check it with a planner.
A wrong belief about a rule does the same damage as the rule. People do not save, do not earn, and do not marry on the strength of things nobody checked.
Carry this forward Asset limits in some programs cap what a person can hold in savings at a level that makes an emergency fund impossible, so spending down becomes the rational move.
An income cliff is a point where a small increase in earnings causes a large loss of benefits or coverage, which makes the hours just before the cliff the most expensive a person can work.
Much of what people are told about these rules is out of date or wrong, and the harm from a wrong belief is the same as the harm from a real rule.
A sort separating rules from assumptions, a scenario decision and a knowledge check.
Ask one person you support what they believe they cannot do with money, and find out from a planner whether it is true.
Browse and download only. Course notes are not typed or saved on this page.
Reset this lesson
Course overview Next lesson Participation and course completion in this program do not count toward DHS-required training credits unless management, a director, or DHS leadership expressly approves an exception.
