Diversity learning · Advanced

Designing and Testing Bias-Reduction Interventions

Move from an appealing training idea to a testable change, with behavioral outcomes, ethical safeguards, and honest limits on what a pilot can establish.

About 56 minutes, plus optional practice · 4 lessons · Voluntary learning

Start learning

All diversity courses: Foundation, Intermediate, and Advanced

Course outline

Turn an aspiration into a testable mechanism
State a specific behavior an intervention is intended to change.
14 minutes
Choose a comparison that answers the question
Explain a limitation of a before-and-after comparison.
14 minutes
Measure benefits, burdens, and implementation
Select an outcome, a process measure, and a balancing measure.
14 minutes
Interpret results and decide what happens next
Distinguish observed results from a causal claim.
14 minutes

Share this course

What you’ll be able to do

Explore and practice

State a specific behavior an intervention is intended to change.
Explain a limitation of a before-and-after comparison.
Select an outcome, a process measure, and a balancing measure.
Distinguish observed results from a causal claim.

What you can take into your work

Explain the reasoning behind a response to each fictional case.
Use the course job aid to propose an observable change and a way to review it.

Write a decision memo with results, limitations, unintended effects, next action, owner, and review date.

Read the introduction

Move from an appealing training idea to a testable change, with behavioral outcomes, ethical safeguards, and honest limits on what a pilot can establish.

Designing and Testing Bias-Reduction Interventions — practice guide

A working aid for examining a decision, preparing a response, and checking what changed.

Move from an appealing training idea to a testable change, with behavioral outcomes, ethical safeguards, and honest limits on what a pilot can establish.

Keep evidence, interpretation, and proposed action distinct.
Use authorized work records only; keep private learning responses out of personnel records.
A course exercise does not replace formal policy, complaint procedures, professional assessment, or decision authority.

Write a decision memo with results, limitations, unintended effects, next action, owner, and review date.

Define the test

Name the barrier and decision behavior.
Link activity, process change, and intended outcome.
Distinguish private reflection from operational evaluation.

Plan ethically

Choose a comparison suited to the question.
Use appropriate authorization and evaluation expertise.
Never withhold required access or protection for a test.
Specify process, outcome, balancing measures, and stopping conditions.

Interpret honestly

Check implementation before interpreting outcomes.
Record sample, timing, competing explanations, and privacy limits.
Distinguish short-term response from persistence.
Decide to continue, revise, stop, or evaluate further and explain why.

Complete a practice record

Decision or situation: describe one concrete example and the specific part within your responsibility.
Evidence: record the observed sequence and identify what is still uncertain; do not include private course reflections or unnecessary personal details.
Proposed action: Write a decision memo with results, limitations, unintended effects, next action, owner, and review date.
Review: name the person responsible, an appropriate review date, and the evidence that would support continuing, revising, or stopping the change.
Return the result: explain what changed and why to the people who need that information, using an appropriate authorized channel.

Participation and course completion in this program do not count toward DHS-required training credits unless management, a director, or DHS leadership expressly approves an exception.

Sources and further reading

Devine and colleagues (2012), Long-term reduction in implicit race bias
Abstract and citation record. Primary habit-breaking intervention study; findings are specific to its design and measures, not a guarantee of workplace behavioral change.
Lai and colleagues (2016), Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time
Abstract and citation record. Primary comparative intervention research emphasizes distinguishing immediate changes from persistence. It does not support employee scoring.
Devine and colleagues (2012), open full text
Open-access primary article for examining methods and limits directly; optional further reading.

All research and sources across the program

Opening your page…

You can still use the navigation while it loads.

Course outline

Turn an aspiration into a testable mechanism

State a specific behavior an intervention is intended to change.

14 minutes

Choose a comparison that answers the question

Explain a limitation of a before-and-after comparison.

14 minutes

Measure benefits, burdens, and implementation

Select an outcome, a process measure, and a balancing measure.

14 minutes

Interpret results and decide what happens next

Distinguish observed results from a causal claim.

14 minutes

Sources and further reading

Devine and colleagues (2012), Long-term reduction in implicit race bias

Abstract and citation record. Primary habit-breaking intervention study; findings are specific to its design and measures, not a guarantee of workplace behavioral change.

Lai and colleagues (2016), Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time

Abstract and citation record. Primary comparative intervention research emphasizes distinguishing immediate changes from persistence. It does not support employee scoring.

Devine and colleagues (2012), open full text

Open-access primary article for examining methods and limits directly; optional further reading.