10 minutes
Reporting honestly and acting on what you find Write results that describe systems, share them back with the people who provided the data, and turn findings into decisions without ever rating an individual.
What you’ll be able to do Write a short results summary that describes processes and barriers, states limits, protects small groups and leads to a named action, without measuring or ranking any individual employee. Compare the responses to this question and explain your choice: What should the practitioner recommend? Document a next step for Reporting honestly and acting on what you find: Take the most recent disability or access result your area produced and rewrite it in the four-part structure. Send it to the people who provided the data, with the action and owner named. The report is part of the relationship People disclose, respond to surveys and file complaints because they hope something will change. When results vanish into a leadership deck, the next response rate falls and the data gets worse. Reporting back closes the loop: here is what you told us, here is what it means, here is what we cannot tell from it, and here is what will happen next and who is responsible.
Honest reporting also means stating limits. A three percent self-identification rate is not a workforce count. A rising complaint count may mean people finally trust the complaint process. A perfect accessibility-check score on documents says nothing about the phone line. Write the limit next to the number and readers will trust both.
Finally, hold the line on individuals. No report, progress summary or comparison in this program measures, scores or ranks an individual employee by disability, accommodation use or self-identification. That is not a data quality rule; it is a condition of the trust that makes the data possible.
Four parts of an honest summary What we measured What it showed What it cannot show What changes now
The measure, the layer it belongs to, the period, the data type it draws on and the group size rule applied. One or two sentences.
The result, any comparison across large enough groups, and the change since the last period. Plain language; no adjectives doing the work of numbers.
The known limits: small groups protected, reluctance to disclose, measures that describe products not experience, or a period too short to read a trend.
The decision the result supports, the owner, the date by which it will be done and how the people who provided the data will hear about it.
I answered the survey honestly because someone finally asked. Then I never heard another word. Next year I left it blank.
Composite staff perspective, illustrative Close the loop in writing What you can change You control whether the people behind the data learn what happened to it.
What to watch for Do not let a result live only in a leadership deck. Do not summarize a small group’s experience in a way that lets colleagues recognize them, even in praise.
Your next step Add a “shared back on” line to every disability or access report you produce, and fill it in.
Reporting habits Write the limit next to the number
“Self-identification rate: 4 percent. This reflects who chose to disclose, not the number of disabled staff.” The sentence protects the reader from a false conclusion.
Praise can expose too
“Our colleague who uses a screen reader found twelve barriers” names a person in a small unit as surely as a complaint would. Thank people in ways they choose.
A rising complaint count
Can mean more barriers, or more trust in the complaint route. Report the themes and resolution times alongside the count so readers can tell which.
The individual-measurement rule
No measure, progress summary or comparison rates or ranks an individual employee by disability, accommodation use or self-identification. No exceptions for good intentions.
Carry this forward A results summary has four parts: what was measured, what it showed, what it cannot show, and what will change and who owns that change.
Sharing results back with disabled staff and participants is part of the method, not a courtesy; it is how the next collection earns a response.
Any progress summary, table or comparison that lets a reader see an individual’s disability status or rank employees by it is out of scope, whatever its stated purpose.
A one-page results summary for one measure, reviewed against the four-part structure and the individual-measurement rule.
Take the most recent disability or access result your area produced and rewrite it in the four-part structure. Send it to the people who provided the data, with the action and owner named.
Browse and download only. Course notes are not typed or saved on this page.
Reset this lesson
Previous lesson Back to course Participation and course completion in this program do not count toward DHS-required training credits unless management, a director, or DHS leadership expressly approves an exception.
