12 minutes
From consultation to partnership Understand the levels of participation, why timing decides whether advice can matter, and what disability-led organizations bring that individual advisors cannot.
What you’ll be able to do Distinguish informing, consulting, involving, collaborating and sharing authority, and match the level of partnership to the weight of a decision and the point in the process where advice can still change it. Compare the responses to this question and explain your choice: What is the honest description of this plan, and what would you change? Document a next step for From consultation to partnership: For the next decision your program makes that affects disabled people, write which level of participation you are offering, when advisors join, and what they can still change at that point. Five levels, one honest question Public agencies use the word “engagement” for very different things. It helps to name the levels. Informing tells people what has been decided. Consulting asks for reactions to options the agency has already drafted. Involving brings people in to shape the options themselves. Collaborating means deciding together, with advisors at the table when trade-offs are made. Sharing authority gives a community body a real vote or a veto on defined decisions. None of these is wrong in itself. Informing is the right level for telling people about a decision already made by law. The failure is calling one level by the name of another, because each level makes a promise, and people can tell when it is broken.
The variable that decides whether a level is real is timing. Advice can only change what is still open. If the requirements are written, the budget approved and the vendor chosen, a listening session is informing no matter how carefully it is facilitated, because the answer to “what can we still change?” is “the training materials.” Co-design means disabled people are present when the problem is framed, when options are generated, when trade-offs are made and when the result is tested. That is earlier, longer and more expensive than a session in the final month, and it is the only version that deserves the name.
Individual advisors and disability-led organizations both matter, and they bring different things. An individual brings their own experience, which is real and specific and not representative of anyone else. An organization led by disabled people, such as a center for independent living, a self-advocacy group or a cross-disability coalition, brings collective knowledge, accountability to a community, the capacity to reach people the agency cannot, and the standing to tell you when a plan is wrong. Treat them as partners with a scope, a budget and a contract, not as a mailing list for recruiting volunteers.
The levels, with the promise each one makes Inform Consult Involve Collaborate Share authority
Promise: we will tell you what was decided, why, and how it affects you, in formats you can use. Right for: decisions already made by law or higher authority. Fails when: it is described as consultation.
Promise: we will ask for your reactions to options we drafted, and tell you how your input influenced the result. Right for: choices among options the agency must own. Fails when: the options are already chosen or the feedback is never reported back.
Promise: you will help shape the options before we choose, and your concerns will be visible in the alternatives considered. Right for: service design, forms, communication, meeting formats. Fails when: people join after the options are fixed.
Promise: we will decide together; you will be at the table when trade-offs are made and your recommendations will be adopted to the greatest extent possible, with reasons given when they are not. Right for: program redesign, policy affecting participation, procurement of systems people must use. Fails when: the table is real but the decision is made elsewhere.
Promise: a defined body holds a vote or a veto on defined decisions. Right for: governance of programs that exist for the community. Fails when: the authority exists on paper but decisions route around it.
Name the level truthfully What you can change You control whether your project plan calls a listening session in the final month “co-design,” or says what it is and moves partnership to the start of the next one.
What to watch for Do not schedule community input after the contract is signed and describe it as partnership. People notice, and the next invitation will go unanswered.
Your next step On your current project plan, write beside each engagement activity the level it actually offers and what can still change at that point. Move one of them earlier.
Partnership vocabulary Co-design
Disabled people present when the problem is framed, when options are generated, when trade-offs are made and when the result is tested. Not a session at the end.
Timing test
Ask, “What can advisors still change at the point they join?” If the answer is only the training materials, the level is informing.
Disability-led organization
An organization governed and staffed mainly by disabled people, accountable to a community. A partner with scope, budget and contract; not a free recruiting channel.
Representation
No individual represents all disabled people. Seek a range across disability types, ages, races, languages, geography and experience with the program, and say plainly whose voices are still missing.
They asked what we thought of the new form. I said the questions were wrong. They said the questions came from the contract. So what exactly were they asking?
Composite advisor perspective, illustrative Carry this forward Participation runs from being told, to being asked, to shaping options, to deciding together, to holding authority; each level makes a different promise and each promise has to be kept.
Timing is the decisive variable: advice invited after the design, budget or contract is fixed cannot change it, whatever the level is called.
Disability-led organizations bring collective knowledge, accountability to a community and the ability to reach people the agency cannot; they should be partners, not sources of free referrals.
A knowledge check on choosing the level; one upcoming decision in your program placed on the ladder with the point at which advisors will join.
For the next decision your program makes that affects disabled people, write which level of participation you are offering, when advisors join, and what they can still change at that point.
Browse and download only. Course notes are not typed or saved on this page.
Reset this lesson
Course overview Next lesson Carry this into practice Work with disabled people and disability-led organizations as paid partners whose expertise changes decisions, and build the loop that shows them it did.
Return to the experience: What did you notice or try, whose perspective informed it, and what would you keep or adjust?
Participation and course completion in this program do not count toward DHS-required training credits unless management, a director, or DHS leadership expressly approves an exception.
