9 minutes
Building a feedback practice that does not reward one style A meritocratic, results-first feedback culture can quietly reward Anglo-coded traits like assertiveness and speed over equally valid work styles. Adjust the practice, not the standard.
What you’ll be able to do Adjust a team's feedback and recognition practice so it evaluates actual results and contribution, rather than defaulting to Anglo-coded traits like assertiveness, speed and self-promotion as proxies for performance. Compare the responses to this question and explain your choice: What is the most accurate response to that comment? Document a next step for Building a feedback practice that does not reward one style: Before your next round of team recognition, write down the specific outcome or contribution being recognized, separate from how loudly or quickly it was communicated. Assertiveness is a style, not a measure of contribution Anglo-cluster norms tend to reward direct, confident, fast self-presentation — speaking up quickly in meetings, stating accomplishments plainly, moving fast. When a team's informal recognition and feedback practice tracks these traits rather than actual outcomes, it can systematically undercount colleagues who contribute just as much through quieter, slower or more written channels, including many colleagues shaped by different cultural norms and plenty who simply have a different working style regardless of background.
Fixing this does not mean asking assertive colleagues to quiet down, or asking quieter colleagues to perform assertiveness they do not have. It means building a recognition and feedback practice that actively looks for contribution across multiple channels — spoken, written, behind-the-scenes — and names specific results rather than rewarding whoever spoke first and loudest.
Practices that separate contribution from communication style Solicit written input before or after meetings, and credit ideas from those channels as visibly as ideas spoken in the room.
In recognition and reviews, name the specific outcome or contribution, not “great energy in meetings.”
Rotate who summarizes team wins so credit is not always assigned by whoever speaks first.
Recognize the result, not the delivery What you can change You control what your team's recognition practice actually measures.
What to watch for Do not coach quieter or more relationship-first colleagues to change their communication style as the fix for an uneven recognition practice.
Your next step In your next team update, credit at least one contribution that came through a written or behind-the-scenes channel, and name it as specifically as you would a spoken one.
Result or delivery style? Reduced a backlog of cases by a documented amount over the quarter.
Choose a category Actual result or contribution Communication style, not a result Spoke first and confidently in every team meeting.
Choose a category Actual result or contribution Communication style, not a result Wrote a process fix that another team later adopted.
Choose a category Actual result or contribution Communication style, not a result Volunteered ideas quickly and loudly before others could speak.
Choose a category Actual result or contribution Communication style, not a result Check matches Reset Carry this forward A results-first, individualist feedback culture can unintentionally reward visible, vocal self-promotion over quieter but equally valuable contributions.
Naming the actual criteria for good performance, separate from communication style, helps a mixed team see how contribution is really being judged.
The goal is a shared standard that recognizes different working styles fairly, not a standard that asks quieter or more relationship-first colleagues to perform assertiveness they do not have.
A scenario decision about redesigning a team's recognition practice, and a knowledge check on separating performance criteria from communication style.
Before your next round of team recognition, write down the specific outcome or contribution being recognized, separate from how loudly or quickly it was communicated.
Browse and download only. Course notes are not typed or saved on this page.
Reset this lesson
Previous lesson Back to course Participation and course completion in this program do not count toward DHS-required training credits unless management, a director, or DHS leadership expressly approves an exception.
