One DSD People, Access and Culture · Learning path · I'm planning work with a community
Community engagement or co-design effort
You are planning community engagement and want the work to be respectful, useful, and grounded in what people actually need.
Outcome: By the end, you will have an engagement plan grounded in the relevant Minnesota Communities briefs, with access needs, partners, and assumptions clearly addressed. Review each relevant brief before completing the plan.
Plan a respectful approach — Use Ask to consider how the partnership commitments and anti-profiling practices apply to your work. · Ask a question — program page /ask?path=gp-3
Read the relevant community briefs (Needed for this optional worksheet) — Open the brief for each community named in the work. Read the overview and the guidance on what to ask, access needs, who to involve, and what not to assume. Note in your plan which briefs you reviewed. · Explore Minnesota Communities — program page /minnesota-communities
Choose practical resources — Use the meeting and outreach access checklist, partner map, and language access checklist as needed. · Access checks before a meeting or outreach — program page /library/ja-access-checks · Partner map — program page /library/ja-stakeholder-map
Draft your engagement plan — Include the questions you will ask, access needs, who to involve, what not to assume, compensation, and how you will report back. Use the downloaded checklist to write your answers in a tool you normally use. This page does not save them.
Review your work — Confirm that you reviewed the relevant briefs, recognized differences within each community, noted what remains unknown, and did not apply group information to any one person.
Talk it through with a consultant (optional) — A consultation can help when a brief does not address your question, the work may involve trauma, or Tribal consultation may be required. · Request a consultation — program page /support/request?path=gp-3
What a useful result looks like
Still needs work
General cultural facts with no connection to the work
Applying information about a group to a named person
Ready to use
The plan addresses questions, access, involvement, and assumptions
Differences within the community are recognized
Questions that remain are clearly noted
Engagement plan
Effort name and purpose (required)
What decision this engagement will influence.
Community briefs you reviewed (required)
List each brief and note that you read its overview and practice guidance.
What you will ask (required)
Use open questions without asking people to relive trauma unnecessarily.
Access needs (required)
Consider language and dialect, interpreters, captioning, timing, location, transportation, child care, and trust.
Who to involve, why, and in what role (required)
Note their purpose, authority, compensation, and how you will report back. For Tribal Nations, consultation comes first.
What not to assume (required)
Recognize differences within every community; immigration, faith, and language are not interchangeable.
Who is responsible for each follow-up (required)
Include the person who will report back to participants.
Questions that remain
Note what is still unknown and seek the appropriate guidance rather than guessing.
Review your notes against
Every follow-up has a named owner
A next review date is set
This is connected to your specific work
Language, disability, and communication access were considered for this work
You named who was involved and the role they had
You noted what you chose not to assume
The relevant Minnesota Communities briefs were reviewed
Questions to bring to Ask
How should we plan a listening session with Somali families in Greater Minnesota without stereotyping?
What does the partnership spine mean for a co-design effort?
Who should be involved in a community engagement plan?